• Home
  • Archives
  • Contact
Sun, July 3, 2022

Venable Fitzpatrick's Legal Updates / Medical Devices

Legal Updates/
Medical Devices

SORT BY:
OR
Home March 2014

Recent Posts

IPRs Filed, USPTO/PTAB

PTAB instituted IPR in Conmed Corporation and Linvatec Corporation v. Bonutti Skeletal Innovations LLC

March 28, 2014 – Administrative Patent Judges Michael Zecher, Benjamin Wood and Mitchell Weatherly granted a petition to institute an…

March 28, 2014
ITC Decisions, ITC/Court Int’l Trade

US ITC denies BMC Medical’s motion for summary determination of invalidity

March 27, 2014-The U.S. International Trade Commission denied BMC Medical Co. Ltd’s motion for summary determination of invalidity of U.S….

March 27, 2014
3rd Circuit, Court Decisions

Judge denies DePuy Synthes Products, LLC’s motions for attorneys’ fees and permanent injunction in infringement action against Globus Medical Inc.

March 25, 2014- In DePuy Synthes Products, LLC v. Globus Medical Inc., (1-11-cv-00652) (D. Del.), District Judge Leonard P. Stark,…

March 25, 2014
11th Circuit, Court Decisions

Judge construes claim terms in Bonutti Skeletal Innovations v. Linvatec Corp

March 25, 2014-In the case of Bonutti Skeletal Innovations LLC v. Linvatec Corporation and Conmed Corporation, District Judge Anne C….

March 25, 2014
1st Circuit, Court Decisions

Judge denies motion to dismiss in In re: Neurografix (360) Patent Litigation

March 24, 2014- In In re: Neurografix (360) Patent Litigation (1-13-md-02432 (D. Ma)), District Judge Richard G. Stearns denied defendants’…

March 24, 2014
7th Circuit, Court Decisions

Judge construes claim terms in Northgate Technologies v. Stryker Corp

March 24, 2014-In the case of Northgate Technologies, Inc. v. Stryker Corporation d/b/a Stryker Endoscopy and W.O.M. World of Medicine…

March 24, 2014
Court Decisions, Fed Circuit

CAFC applies Kessler Doctrine in Brain Life LLC v. Elekta Inc.

March 24, 2014- In Brain Life LLC v. Elekta Inc., No. 13-1239 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 24, 2014), the Federal Circuit…

March 24, 2014
IPRs Filed, USPTO/PTAB

PTAB grants Arthrex Inc.’s petition for IPR against Bonutti Skeletal Innovations, LLC

March 21, 2014- Administrative Patent Judges Michael R. Zecher, Benjamin D. M. Wood, and Mitchell G. Weatherly granted petitioner Arthrex…

March 21, 2014
IPR Decisions, USPTO/PTAB

PTAB authorizes Alcon Research, Ltd. to file reply to Neev’s preliminary response in IPR

March 20, 2014- In inter partes review of U.S. Patent No. 6,482,199 owned by Dr. Joseph Neev directed to dental…

March 21, 2014
ITC Decisions, ITC/Court Int’l Trade

ITC grants-in-part and denies-in-part BMC Medical Co., Ltd.’s motion to strike certain evidence in the Matter of Certain Sleep-Disordered Breathing Treatment Systems and Components Thereof

March 20, 2014- In the Matter of Certain Sleep-Disordered Breathing Treatment Systems and Components Thereof (337-TA-890), Administrative Law Judge Thomas…

March 20, 2014
Load More

Popular Posts

  • IPR / PGR / CBM Medical Device Updates in February 2021
  • IPR / PGR / CBM Medical Device Updates in January 2021
  • IPR / PGR / CBM Medical Device Updates in December 2020
  • IPR / PGR / CBM Medical Device Updates in November 2020
  • IPR / PGR / CBM Medical Device Updates in October 2020

Connect With Us

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING

® /TM / © Venable LLP 2022. All Rights Reserved.

The individuals who maintain this site work for Venable LLP. The information, comments and links posted on this site do not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship has been or will be formed by any communication(s) to, from or with the site and/or the author. For legal advice, contact an attorney at Venable LLP or an attorney actively practicing in your jurisdiction. Do not send any confidential or privileged information to the author; neither Venable LLP nor the author will assume any liability or responsibility for it. If you send any information, documents or materials to the site, you give permission for the author to include them on or in the site. No information, documents or materials you send to the site will be considered confidential or privileged by Venable LLP or its lawyers. Also, no such information, documents or materials will be returned to you. All decisions relating to the content belong to the author.