• Home
  • Archives
  • Contact
Sun, July 3, 2022

Venable Fitzpatrick's Legal Updates / Medical Devices

Legal Updates/
Medical Devices

SORT BY:
OR
Home June 2017

Recent Posts

3rd Circuit, Court Cases Filed

Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC Files Amended Complaint against Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.

On June 30, 2017, Plaintiff Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GMBH and Sanofi Winthrop Industrie filed a second amended and…

June 30, 2017
ITC Cases Filed, ITC/Court Int’l Trade, Uncategorized

Hologic, Inc. Requests ITC to Investigate FUJIFILM’s X-Ray Breast Imaging Devices

On June 28, 2017, Hologic, Inc. filed a complaint requesting United States International Trade Commission to investigate Certain X-Ray Breast…

June 29, 2017
9th Circuit, Court Decisions

District Court Denies in Part and Grants in Part Motion to Compel Discovery Over Medical Imaging Systems

On June 28, 2017, Magistrate Judge Jacqueline S. Corley denied Plaintiffs Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc.’s motion to compel Defendants Stryker…

June 28, 2017
9th Circuit, Court Decisions

District Court Grants Motion for Leave to File a Motion for Reconsideration Over Activity Monitoring Device

On June 28, 2017, District Judge Beth L. Freeman granted Plaintiff Fitbit Inc.’s motion for leave to file a motion…

June 28, 2017
1st Circuit, Court Decisions

District Court Grants Motion for Summary Judgment on Grounds of No Willful Infringement and Denies Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment on Damages

On June 28, 2017, District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton granted Defendants Zoll Medical Corporation’s motion for summary judgment on grounds…

June 28, 2017
4th Circuit, Court Decisions

District Court Grants Unopposed Motion to Transfer Venue Under TC Heartland

On June 28, 2017, District Judge R Bryan Harwell granted Defendants Recon Medical LLC’s unopposed motion to transfer venue from…

June 28, 2017
7th Circuit, Court Decisions

District Court Defers Ruling on Motion for Jurisdictional Discovery

On June 28, 2017, District Judge James D. Peterson deferred ruling on Plaintiff Imran Niazi’s motion for jurisdiction discovery under…

June 28, 2017
11th Circuit, Court Decisions

Middle District of Florida Excludes the Altered Opinion of Rembrandt’s Expert

On June 27, 2017, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida granted the Daubert motion filed…

June 28, 2017
IPR Decisions, USPTO/PTAB Decisions

Acuity Innovation and Design LLC Filed Patent Infringement Complaint Against Arizona Dental Professionals, PC d/b/a Arrowhead Creekside Dental

On June 26, 2017, Plaintiff Acuity Innovation and Design, LLC filed a complaint for a patent infringement against Defendants Arizona…

June 26, 2017
IPR Decisions, USPTO/PTAB Decisions

PTAB Decides that the Petitioner has Shown by a Preponderance of the Evidence that the Challenged Claims of a MRI Technology Patent are Unpatentable

On  June 26, 2017, In a final written decision, the Board found claims of a patent directed to MRI technology…

June 26, 2017
Load More

Popular Posts

  • IPR / PGR / CBM Medical Device Updates in February 2021
  • IPR / PGR / CBM Medical Device Updates in January 2021
  • IPR / PGR / CBM Medical Device Updates in December 2020
  • IPR / PGR / CBM Medical Device Updates in November 2020
  • IPR / PGR / CBM Medical Device Updates in October 2020

Connect With Us

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING

® /TM / © Venable LLP 2022. All Rights Reserved.

The individuals who maintain this site work for Venable LLP. The information, comments and links posted on this site do not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship has been or will be formed by any communication(s) to, from or with the site and/or the author. For legal advice, contact an attorney at Venable LLP or an attorney actively practicing in your jurisdiction. Do not send any confidential or privileged information to the author; neither Venable LLP nor the author will assume any liability or responsibility for it. If you send any information, documents or materials to the site, you give permission for the author to include them on or in the site. No information, documents or materials you send to the site will be considered confidential or privileged by Venable LLP or its lawyers. Also, no such information, documents or materials will be returned to you. All decisions relating to the content belong to the author.