• Home
  • Archives
  • Contact
Sun, July 3, 2022

Venable Fitzpatrick's Legal Updates / Medical Devices

Legal Updates/
Medical Devices

SORT BY:
OR
Home November 2017

Recent Posts

3rd Circuit, Court Cases Filed

Globus Sues To Enforce Noncompete and Nondisclosure Agreements of Former Engineer

November 21, 2017 – On November 17, Globus Medical Inc. filed suit against a former engineer who resigned to take…

November 21, 2017
5th Circuit, Court Cases Filed

UT and TissueGen Assert Drug-Eluting Biodegradeable Fiber Patents Against Boston Scientific

November 21, 2017 – In a complaint filed November 20, 2017, the University of Texas and licensee TissueGen allege infringement…

November 21, 2017
8th Circuit, Court Decisions

Attorney Fees Based On Rejected Claim Construction Denied

November 21, 2017 – On November 17, 2017, the Minnesota District Court declined to find Spineology, Inc.’s infringement suit against…

November 21, 2017
9th Circuit, Court Decisions

AngioScore and TriReme Medical Settle Patent Suit Over Heart Catheters

November 20, 2017 – AngioScore, Inc. and TriReme Medical LLC settled their patent infringement action over angioplasty balloon catheter technology,…

November 20, 2017
5th Circuit, Court Decisions

Eastern District of Texas issues a Claim Construction Memorandum and Order for disputed claim terms in patent at center of Viveve, Inc. v. ThermiGen, LLC, et al.

On October 24, 2016, Plaintiff Viveve, Inc. filed a patent infringement suit against Defendants ThermiGen, LLC, ThermiAesthetics, LLC, and Dr….

November 17, 2017
9th Circuit, Court Decisions

Court Denied Plaintiff’s Motion for Discovery Sanctions

November 16, 2017 – On November 13, 2017, the court denied Plaintiff Karl Storz Endoscopy-America’s motion for discovery sanctions after…

November 16, 2017
3rd Circuit, Court Cases Filed

Align Technology Files Four Patent Infringement Complaints Against 3Shape Over Intraoral Scanner Technology

November 15, 2017 – Align Technology, Inc. filed four complaints for patent infringement against 3Shape A/S and 3Shape Inc. on…

November 15, 2017
9th Circuit, Court Decisions

Court Denied In Part and Granted in Part Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Contentions and Grants Defendant’s Motion to Amend its Invalidity Contentions

November 15, 2017 – On November 13, 2017, the court granted Plaintiff Karl Storz Endoscopy-America’s motion to strike portions of…

November 15, 2017
3rd Circuit, Court Decisions

Court Granted Plaintiff’s Motion to Supplement Pleading

November 15, 2017 – On November 13, 2017, the court granted Plaintiffs Ethicon Endo-Surgery’s, Ethicon LLC’s, and Ethicon US, LLC’s…

November 15, 2017
IPR Decisions, USPTO/PTAB

PTAB denies institution of IPR of a patent wherein the patent holder disclaimed the challenged claims

On November 15, 2017, the Board denied institution of inter partes review of a patent because all the challenged claims…

November 15, 2017
Load More

Popular Posts

  • IPR / PGR / CBM Medical Device Updates in February 2021
  • IPR / PGR / CBM Medical Device Updates in January 2021
  • IPR / PGR / CBM Medical Device Updates in December 2020
  • IPR / PGR / CBM Medical Device Updates in November 2020
  • IPR / PGR / CBM Medical Device Updates in October 2020

Connect With Us

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING

® /TM / © Venable LLP 2022. All Rights Reserved.

The individuals who maintain this site work for Venable LLP. The information, comments and links posted on this site do not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship has been or will be formed by any communication(s) to, from or with the site and/or the author. For legal advice, contact an attorney at Venable LLP or an attorney actively practicing in your jurisdiction. Do not send any confidential or privileged information to the author; neither Venable LLP nor the author will assume any liability or responsibility for it. If you send any information, documents or materials to the site, you give permission for the author to include them on or in the site. No information, documents or materials you send to the site will be considered confidential or privileged by Venable LLP or its lawyers. Also, no such information, documents or materials will be returned to you. All decisions relating to the content belong to the author.