• Home
  • Archives
  • Contact
Sun, May 22, 2022

Venable Fitzpatrick's Legal Updates / Medical Devices

Legal Updates/
Medical Devices

SORT BY:
OR
Home Venue Fed Circuit

Recent Posts

Fed Circuit, IPR Decisions, IPR Petitions, IPRs Filed, IPRs Instituted, USPTO/PTAB, USPTO/PTAB Decisions

IPR / PGR / CBM Medical Device Updates in February 2021

IPR, PGR, and CBM Filings IPR2021-00494: Koninklijke Philips NV v. Fitbit, Inc. IPR2021-00505: Koninklijke Philips NV v. Fitbit, Inc. IPR2021-00526:…

March 23, 2021
Fed Circuit, IPR Decisions, IPR Petitions, IPRs Filed, IPRs Instituted, USPTO/PTAB, USPTO/PTAB Decisions

IPR / PGR / CBM Medical Device Updates in January 2021

IPR, PGR, and CBM Filings IPR2021-00239: Medtronic CoreValve LLC v. Speyside Medical, LLC IPR2021-00240: Medtronic CoreValve LLC v. Speyside Medical,…

March 23, 2021
Fed Circuit, IPR Decisions, IPR Petitions, IPRs Filed, IPRs Instituted, USPTO/PTAB, USPTO/PTAB Decisions

IPR / PGR / CBM Medical Device Updates in December 2020

IPR, PGR, and CBM Filings IPR2021-00245: Materialise, NV v. Osteoplastics, LLC IPR2021-00246: Materialise, NV v. Osteoplastics, LLC IPR2021-00247: Materialise, NV…

March 23, 2021
Fed Circuit, IPR Decisions, IPR Petitions, IPRs Filed, IPRs Instituted, USPTO/PTAB, USPTO/PTAB Decisions

IPR / PGR / CBM Medical Device Updates in November 2020

IPR, PGR, and CBM Filings IPR2021-00193: Apple Inc. v. Masimo Corporation IPR2021-00195: Apple Inc. v. Masimo Corporation IPR2021-00208: Apple Inc….

December 14, 2020
Fed Circuit, IPR Decisions, IPR Petitions, IPRs Filed, IPRs Instituted, USPTO/PTAB, USPTO/PTAB Decisions

IPR / PGR / CBM Medical Device Updates in October 2020

IPR, PGR, and CBM Filings IPR2020-01687: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. v. P Tech, LLC IPR2020-01711: New World Medical, Inc. v. MicroSurgical…

November 9, 2020
Fed Circuit, IPR Decisions, IPR Petitions, IPRs Filed, IPRs Instituted, USPTO/PTAB, USPTO/PTAB Decisions

IPR / PGR / CBM Medical Device Updates in September 2020

IPR, PGR, and CBM Filings IPR2020-01453: Medtronic CoreValve LLC v. Colibri Heart Valve LLC IPR2020-01454: Medtronic CoreValve LLC v. Colibri…

October 13, 2020
Fed Circuit, IPR Decisions, IPR Petitions, IPRs Filed, IPRs Instituted, USPTO/PTAB, USPTO/PTAB Decisions

IPR / PGR / CBM Medical Device Updates in June 2020

IPR, PGR, and CBM Filings IPR2020-01033: Sotera Wireless, Inc. v. Masimo Corporation IPR2020-01054: Sotera Wireless, Inc. v. Masimo Corporation IPR2020-01074:…

July 3, 2020
Court Decisions, Fed Circuit

Federal Circuit holds that PTAB erred in too narrowly construing the problem addressed in Smith & Nephew’s surgical patent

January 31, 2018—Smith & Nephew (“Smith”) own U.S. Patent No. 7,226,459, entitled “Reciprocating Rotary Arthroscopic Surgical Instrument.” The patent pertains…

January 31, 2018
Court Decisions, Fed Circuit

Federal Circuit Affirms PTAB in Arthrex Suture Patent IPR

January 25, 2018 – The Federal Circuit upheld the judgment of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) in IPR2016-00917,…

January 25, 2018
Court Decisions, Fed Circuit

Federal Circuit Affirms Mitral Valve Implant Trade Secret Misappropriation Ruling

September 6, 2017 – In May, 2016, a Massachusetts federal jury found that Neovasc Inc. had misappropriated trade secrets relating…

September 6, 2017
Load More

Popular Posts

  • IPR / PGR / CBM Medical Device Updates in February 2021
  • IPR / PGR / CBM Medical Device Updates in January 2021
  • IPR / PGR / CBM Medical Device Updates in December 2020
  • IPR / PGR / CBM Medical Device Updates in November 2020
  • IPR / PGR / CBM Medical Device Updates in October 2020

Connect With Us

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING

® /TM / © Venable LLP 2022. All Rights Reserved.

The individuals who maintain this site work for Venable LLP. The information, comments and links posted on this site do not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship has been or will be formed by any communication(s) to, from or with the site and/or the author. For legal advice, contact an attorney at Venable LLP or an attorney actively practicing in your jurisdiction. Do not send any confidential or privileged information to the author; neither Venable LLP nor the author will assume any liability or responsibility for it. If you send any information, documents or materials to the site, you give permission for the author to include them on or in the site. No information, documents or materials you send to the site will be considered confidential or privileged by Venable LLP or its lawyers. Also, no such information, documents or materials will be returned to you. All decisions relating to the content belong to the author.